Author: Samantha Penney, samantha.penney@gmail.com
Schrum and Levin stress however, that "It is our belief that knowledge does not and cannot reside in any one individual, text, object, or tool." (2009) I too agree that knowledge has to be gleaned from multiple sources, experiences, and people. Afterall, we are preparing our current digital natives for job that don't even exist yet. It is essential that every student be well versed in the Web 2.0 tools and promote the 21st-century skills of critical thinking, creativity, innovation, and collaboration. (2009)
This class has taught me to be more patient with my students and to think back to what it feels like to learn something new. Too often teachers become the "experts" and we forget how vulnerable we can become when we are out of our "comfort zones." There were times I experienced this same feeling. For example during the animoto, webquest, and screencast projects, I was afraid I was going to make a mistake. I was afraid I would look dumb in front of my peers. I didn't feel adequate. I wonder how many of my students feel when I start a new unit, or introduce new vocabulary, or a new concept. How can I put my students at ease with integrating technology and keep learning fun?
I have also been reminded of the importance of connecting the state standards to what my students should be able to know and do in order to validate the purpose of my lesson. Am I doing this lesson because it is fun? Or am I teaching the lesson because it is meaningful and valuable in the long run? I found the UDL (Universal Design for Learning) helpful to see what research has shown to be the most effective way of teaching. Basically, present information and content in different ways, differentiate the ways students can express what they know, and finally stimulate the students' interest and motivation.
With that being said, I can say that this class is an example of best practices: information and content were presented in different ways (lecture, video, blackboard), we were allowed to choice and say of ways that we wanted to express our learning, and finally we were motivated based on our individual interests. As a result, I have changed my way of thinking about technology. Instead of fighting it, I say, "Why not?" The bottom line is that 20 years from now I still want my students learning--how can I prepare them now to think critically, creatively, with innovation, and collaboration? Now I don't have to be "sage on the stage." Now my students can take ownership of their own learning and reflect about their own learning for a lifetime.
Resource:
Schrum, L., & Levin, B. Leading 21st century schools: harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin, 2009